بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم ,,
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته ,,
اقرا الموضوع واكتشف الفورد والامريكي على وجه العموم وش قد هو خردة واشكال فقط بدون قوة ..
شوفوا هالثور الامريكي شكبره شلون عفستة القطوة الاوروبية :D :D ,,
Wow. Both of these vehicles hit the exact same off-set barrier at 40mph. Now there's no question what would win in a head-on collesion between the two but then again the majority of accidents involve only a single car. All you have to do is look at the dummy's legs and you can get an idea of what would happen if you hit a wall in either car. The MINI had almost no intrusion which "indicates that the driver's survival space was maintained very well" - the F150 on the other hand had "Major collapse of the occupant compartment that left little survival space for the driver."
I'm interested in how a company could create a modern vehicle that could perform so badly on this test. Furthermore Ford had lots of space to work with to make this a safe vehicle. For BMW/MINI to do the job in 1/4 the space is what engineering is all about.
Keep in mind also this is the best selling vehicle in the US. One would think that Ford, knowing this, would have put more effort into the engineering of this truck. It gets worse; this platform is also the basis of both the Ford Expedition and to some extent the Ford Excursion. Both are marketed to be tough, safe, go anywhere SUVs and are sold as family transportation.
صور اخرى للفورد
http://www.iihs.org/vehicle_ratings.../0110_3_28t.jpg
http://www.iihs.org/vehicle_ratings.../0110_4_35t.jpg
والحمدالله ان عندي فولفو ,,
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته ,,
اقرا الموضوع واكتشف الفورد والامريكي على وجه العموم وش قد هو خردة واشكال فقط بدون قوة ..
شوفوا هالثور الامريكي شكبره شلون عفستة القطوة الاوروبية :D :D ,,
Wow. Both of these vehicles hit the exact same off-set barrier at 40mph. Now there's no question what would win in a head-on collesion between the two but then again the majority of accidents involve only a single car. All you have to do is look at the dummy's legs and you can get an idea of what would happen if you hit a wall in either car. The MINI had almost no intrusion which "indicates that the driver's survival space was maintained very well" - the F150 on the other hand had "Major collapse of the occupant compartment that left little survival space for the driver."
I'm interested in how a company could create a modern vehicle that could perform so badly on this test. Furthermore Ford had lots of space to work with to make this a safe vehicle. For BMW/MINI to do the job in 1/4 the space is what engineering is all about.
Keep in mind also this is the best selling vehicle in the US. One would think that Ford, knowing this, would have put more effort into the engineering of this truck. It gets worse; this platform is also the basis of both the Ford Expedition and to some extent the Ford Excursion. Both are marketed to be tough, safe, go anywhere SUVs and are sold as family transportation.
صور اخرى للفورد
http://www.iihs.org/vehicle_ratings.../0110_3_28t.jpg
http://www.iihs.org/vehicle_ratings.../0110_4_35t.jpg
والحمدالله ان عندي فولفو ,,
